What effect does the messaging imply about the governor's actions regarding the budget?

The implication of inconsistency in promises and actions suggests that the messaging critiques the governor's budgetary decisions. When public communications highlight a disparity between what the governor has promised and what has actually been delivered, it raises questions about reliability and trustworthiness. This discrepancy can lead the audience to perceive the actions as not aligning with the stated intentions, thereby fostering skepticism among constituents. Such implications often aim to sway public opinion against the governor, positioning him or her as failing to follow through on commitments made during campaigning or in previous addresses. This approach serves to highlight a perceived weakness in leadership and governance, ultimately affecting how the public views the governor's efficacy and integrity.