Which persuasive technique is mainly absent in the couple's negotiation regarding the mortgage?

In this scenario, the primary persuasive technique that stands out as absent during the couple's negotiation is the lack of any identifiable persuasive strategies. The negotiation might allude to their differing perspectives or personal stakes, but it does not actively incorporate any of the common persuasive methods such as presenting hard data or statistics, appealing to emotions, or invoking credible ethical standards.

Absence of a persuasive technique implies that the negotiation may center more on personal opinions or positions rather than structured appeals designed to sway the other party. As a result, the conversation might lack the elements that typically help in reaching an agreement, such as statistical evidence that supports their reasons for mortgage terms, emotional connections that might resonate during discussions, or ethical considerations that could enhance trust in their proposals.

The absence of these methodologies means that the couple's negotiation relies solely on their personal arguments without bolstering their positions with persuasive evidence or appeals, which is essential in effective negotiation strategies.